July 26th, 2011 by zen
At Fabius Maximus, Dr. Chet Richards reviews...
Read morePosted in academia, analytic, attention, authors, book, brain, chet richards, cognition, Epistemology, fabius maximus, feedback, ideas, intellectuals, john boyd, metacognition, Patterns, Perception, psychology, science, social science, strategist, strategy, synthesis, Tactics, theory, uncertainty | 5 comments
April 14th, 2011 by zen
This is very good. And it is fast. I have...
Read morePosted in academia, analytic, attention, authors, book, brain, cognition, Collaboration, connectivity, counterintuitive, creativity, cultural intelligence, culture, education, Epistemology, horizontal thinking, ideas, innovation, insight, intellectuals, intelligence, medici effect, meme, metacognition, Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, network theory, organizations, Perception, priming, psychology, science, social networks, social science, society, synthesis, theory, visualization, web 2.0, wikinomics, youtube | 7 comments
March 6th, 2011 by zen
Great multidisciplinary talk by Dr. Denis...
Read morePosted in academia, analytic, anthropology, attention, brain, cognition, cultural intelligence, culture, Evolution, history, horizontal thinking, ideas, intellectuals, Perception, philosophy, Prehistoric, psychology, science, social science, society, sociobiology, synthesis, TED, theory | Comments Off on The Sociobiological Origins of Beauty
March 3rd, 2011 by zen
Nick Carr’s new book gets smacked upside...
Read morePosted in analytic, authors, book, brain, cluetrain manifesto, cognition, metacognition, reading | Comments Off on Maybe Shallow, Poorly Supported, Arguments Make Us Stupid?
January 4th, 2011 by Charles Cameron
Posted in academia, analogy, analytic, anthropology, art, brain, Charles Cameron, cognition, complexity, connectivity, consilience, cultural intelligence, economics, history, ideas, insight, map, metacognition, music, network theory, philosophy, psychology, rambling, science, social science, synthesis, Theology, theory, Uncategorized, visualization | Comments Off on An Iridology of the Sciences?