Archive for the 'rambling'

• Quoting Joseph Smith on “the Al-Koran or the sword”

October 18th, 2011 by Charles Cameron

Posted in #FAIL, 19th century, Charles Cameron, christianity, history, rambling, Religion, romney, Theology, thoughts illustrated | 9 comments

• Diesel Boats Forever! or ever?

July 14th, 2011 by J.ScottShipman

Posted in 21st century, 4GW, china, europe, J. Scott Shipman, military reform, modularity, navy, nuclear, pacific empire, rambling, strategy, Uncategorized | 15 comments

• Corn’s Caliphates in Wonderland

March 26th, 2011 by zen

Posted in 19th century, 20th century, 21st century, 4GW, 9/11, academia, Afghanistan, al qaida, America, analogy, analytic, anthropology, arab world, authors, COIN, cold war, counterinsurgency, cultural intelligence, diplomatic history, extremists, Failed State, geopolitics, government, history, horizontal thinking, ideas, intellectuals, islam.insurgency, islamic world, islamist, mideast, national security, non-state actors, organizations, pakistan, Perception, politics, primary loyalties, public diplomacy, rambling, Religion, small wars journal, social networks, social science, state terrorism, strategy, Strategy and War, swj blog, synthesis, terrorism, Theology, theory, transnational criminal organization, tribes, turkey, virtual states, war | 12 comments

• Two courtyards, two hundred camels

March 6th, 2011 by Charles Cameron

Posted in Afghanistan, analogy, arab world, authors, Charles Cameron, cognition, creativity, cultural intelligence, fun, games, humor, meme, rambling, recommended reading, symmetry, Writing | 3 comments

• An Iridology of the Sciences?

January 4th, 2011 by Charles Cameron

Posted in academia, analogy, analytic, anthropology, art, brain, Charles Cameron, cognition, complexity, connectivity, consilience, cultural intelligence, economics, history, ideas, insight, map, metacognition, music, network theory, philosophy, psychology, rambling, science, social science, synthesis, Theology, theory, Uncategorized, visualization | Comments Off on An Iridology of the Sciences?